May 4, 2022
Xiulei Mo, PhD, Qiankun Niu, PhD, and Andrey Ivanov, PhD, of the Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology are co-first authors of a new paper that identifies prevalent mutation-enhanced protein-protein interactions in cancer, revealing potential tumor-selective drug targets.
Scientists at Emory have revealed widespread distortions of a cell’s protein interaction machinery resulting from cancer-causing mutations. They developed a process resembling ground-penetrating radar, for its ability to map the hidden landscape of anticancer drug opportunities.
The results are published in Cell.
“One reason why a mutation is tumorigenic is the altered network of protein-protein interactions,” says lead author Haian Fu, PhD, professor and chair of pharmacology and chemical biology at Emory University School of Medicine. “The mutation may form a new epitope: a new interaction surface. Such a single protein residue alteration can rewire the cell, leading it down the path of an oncogenic program.”
The co-first authors of the Cell paper are assistant professor Xiulei Mo, PhD, instructor Qiankun Niu, PhD, and assistant professor Andrey Ivanov, PhD, of pharmacology and chemical biology.
The researchers have mapped altered protein-protein interactions resulting from mutations in major cancer-associated genes such as BRAF, AKT1, SPOP and SMAD4. They termed these new mutation-enhanced protein-protein interactions “neoPPIs.” The study led to the identification of prevalent neoPPIs in cancer, revealing potential tumor-selective drug targets.
In a case study, researchers show how a common mutation in the gene BRAF — V600E, found in most melanomas, as well as lung and colon cancers — triggers a new interaction between the BRAF-encoded protein and a redox regulator protein KEAP1. Other aspects of how V600E warps cell metabolism have been studied, but this interaction was not previously known.
As a result of the mutation and KEAP1 sequestration, cancer cells produce more of the redox enzyme NQO1. This creates an opportunity to poison the cells by feeding them a compound the enzyme converts into something toxic. Taking advantage of this vulnerability, researchers found that BRAF-mutated cells were more sensitive to the compound DNQ (deoxynyboquinone).
There were already targeted therapies aimed at the BRAF V600E mutation, such as vemurafenib, which was FDA-approved in 2011. However, cancers vary in response to drugs like vemurafenib and most eventually develop resistance. The information in the study could illuminate new tactics for overcoming resistance to those types of medications, or other weak links in the BRAF pathway.
The Cell paper is supported by the National Cancer Institute’s Cancer Target Discovery and Development (CTD2) network that aims to translate cancer genomics data into therapeutic strategies, Fu says.
“Cancer genomics initiatives have collected a vast amount of data about cancer-associated mutations,” Fu says. “The challenge is: for a given mutation, how do we rapidly translate that knowledge into more mechanistic understanding and genotype-directed cancer therapies? This is one way we can move toward that goal.”
The researchers detect altered interactions by harnessing engineered proteins, originally derived from jellyfish and a deep-sea shrimp. Scientists can detect when the two proteins come within 10 nanometers of each other in living cells, using a combination of bioluminescence and fluorescence (BRET or bioluminescence resonance energy transfer). The interaction test can then be performed on a large scale with a robot, on thousands of cancer-associated protein pairs.
To pinpoint single residue change-induced neoPPIs, the research team tested the ability of a mutated protein to bind a cancer-associated protein in comparison with its wild type counterpart. A computational algorithm was integrated to expose mutation-enabled interactions. Researchers also check their results by verifying whether the two proteins in question, such as BRAF and KEAP1, actually interact in relevant cancer cells using other biochemical and cellular tests.
The researchers extended this study and mapped altered protein-protein interactions resulting from mutations in other cancer-associated genes such as P53, PTEN and EGFR, and have made the data available to the cancer research community. Fu notes that the described approach can also be utilized to identify neoPPI targets enabled by mutations that are critical for other human diseases.
Emory co-authors include Cong Tang, Changfa Shu, Qianjin Li, Kun Qian, Alafate Wahafu, Sean P. Doyle, Danielle Cicka, Xuan Yang, Dacheng Fan, Matthew A. Reyna, Lee A.D. Cooper, Carlos S. Moreno, Wei Zhou, Taofeek Owonikoko, Sagar Lonial, Fadlo R. Khuri, Yuhong Du and Suresh S. Ramalingam. Collaborators Yiu Huen Tsang and Gordon Mills from OHSU contributed to the paper.
This research was supported by the National Cancer Institute (U01CA217875, U01CA217842, P50CA217691, 5P30CA138292), the American Cancer Society (IRG-17-181-06), the Georgia Clinical Translational Science Alliance (UL1TR002378), the Miriam and Sheldon Adelson Medical Research Foundation and an I3 (Imagine, Innovate and Impact) grant from Emory University School of Medicine.
By exercising the Licensed Rights (defined below), You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License (“Public License”). To the extent this Public License may be interpreted as a contract, You are granted the Licensed Rights in consideration of Your acceptance of these terms and conditions, and the Licensor grants You such rights in consideration of benefits the Licensor receives from making the Licensed Material available under these terms and conditions.
Section 1 – Definitions.
Section 2 – Scope.
Section 3 – License Conditions.
Your exercise of the Licensed Rights is expressly made subject to the following conditions.
If You Share the Licensed Material, You must:
Section 4 – Sui Generis Database Rights.
Where the Licensed Rights include Sui Generis Database Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material:
Section 5 – Disclaimer of Warranties and Limitation of Liability.
Section 6 – Term and Termination.
Where Your right to use the Licensed Material has terminated under Section 6(a), it reinstates:
Section 7 – Other Terms and Conditions.
Section 8 – Interpretation.
Creative Commons is not a party to its public licenses. Notwithstanding, Creative Commons may elect to apply one of its public licenses to material it publishes and in those instances will be considered the “Licensor.” The text of the Creative Commons public licenses is dedicated to the public domain under the CC0 Public Domain Dedication. Except for the limited purpose of indicating that material is shared under a Creative Commons public license or as otherwise permitted by the Creative Commons policies published at creativecommons.org/policies, Creative Commons does not authorize the use of the trademark “Creative Commons” or any other trademark or logo of Creative Commons without its prior written consent including, without limitation, in connection with any unauthorized modifications to any of its public licenses or any other arrangements, understandings, or agreements concerning use of licensed material. For the avoidance of doubt, this paragraph does not form part of the public licenses.